var k =[1,2];
var m = [5];
var n = k.concat(m)
var n = [k, m]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
concat | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
concat | 2783280.2 Ops/sec |
spread | 4650483.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches to concatenating arrays in JavaScript: concat()
and spread syntax (...
).
k
and m
, with values [1, 2]
and [5]
, respectively. This code is executed before each test case.Test Cases
There are two individual test cases:
n
by concatenating the arrays k
and m
using the concat()
method.n
by spreading the elements of k
and m
using the spread syntax (...
) and then concatenating them.Comparison
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of these two approaches on modern JavaScript engines, specifically Chrome 81 running on Windows Desktop.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
...
):concat()
.Other Considerations:
Library and Special JS Features:
There is no library mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, the spread syntax (...
) relies on a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), which may not be supported by older browsers or environments.
Alternatives:
Other approaches to concatenating arrays include:
Array.prototype.push()
: Instead of concatenating two arrays, you can add elements one by one using push()
. This approach can be more efficient if the arrays are relatively small.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide the same level of performance or readability as the concat()
method or spread syntax, depending on your specific use case and requirements.