Benchmark: String looping vs split

Script Preparation code:

var digits = Math.floor(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER * Math.random()).toString() 
	+ Math.floor(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER * Math.random()).toString();

Tests:

for loop
let sum = 0; for (let i = 0; i < digits.length; ++i) { sum += +digits[i]; }
Array.prototype.reduce.call
let sum = 0; sum = Array.prototype.reduce.call(digits, (prev, curr) => prev + +curr, 0);
Array.prototype.reduce.apply
let sum = 0; sum = Array.prototype.reduce.apply(digits, [(prev, curr) => prev + +curr, 0]);
Array.prototype.forEach
let sum = 0; Array.prototype.forEach.apply(digits, [(i) => sum += +i]);
.split.reduce
let sum = 0; sum = digits.split('').reduce((prev, curr) => prev + +curr, 0);
.split.forEach
let sum = 0; digits.split('').forEach((i) => sum += +i);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

Test case name	Result
for loop
Array.prototype.reduce.call
Array.prototype.reduce.apply
Array.prototype.forEach
.split.reduce
.split.forEach

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/86.0.4240.80 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 86 on Mac OS X 10.15.5

Test name	Executions per second
for loop	241296.7 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.reduce.call	400579.1 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.reduce.apply	391032.7 Ops/sec
Array.prototype.forEach	385475.3 Ops/sec
.split.reduce	2769820.0 Ops/sec
.split.forEach	2268314.0 Ops/sec

String looping vs split (version: 0)