Benchmark: Labels - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.7.11/lodash.min.js'></script>

AخA
 
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.7.11/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

function getRandomInt(max) {
  return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}

var values = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){
  values.push(getRandomInt(10000));
}

​x
 
function getRandomInt(max) {  return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));}​var values = [];for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++){  values.push(getRandomInt(10000));}

Tests:

old

const result = [];
for (let i = _.min(values); i <= _.max(values); i++) {
  result.push(i);
}
_.reverse(result);

 
const result = [];for (let i = _.min(values); i <= _.max(values); i++) {  result.push(i);}_.reverse(result);

new

const startValue = Math.min(...values);
const endValue = Math.max(...values); 
const result = new Array(endValue - startValue);
for (let value = endValue, index = 0; value >= startValue; value--, index++) {
  result[index] = value;
}
return result;

 
const startValue = Math.min(...values);const endValue = Math.max(...values); const result = new Array(endValue - startValue);for (let value = endValue, index = 0; value >= startValue; value--, index++) {  result[index] = value;}return result;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Experimental features:

Memory measurements supported only in Chrome.
For precise memory measurements Chrome must be launched with --enable-precise-memory-info flag.
More information: Monitoring JavaScript Memory

Test case name	Result
old
new

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/81.0.4044.113 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 81 on Mac OS X 10.14.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
old	20.0 Ops/sec
new	24352.7 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):

I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in this benchmark.

What is being tested?

The provided JSON represents two test cases, labeled as "old" and "new", which are designed to measure the performance difference between using Lodash's min and max functions versus using JavaScript's built-in Math.min and Math.max functions. The test case creates an array of 1000 random integers between 0 and 10,000, and then uses these functions to create a new array with the values in ascending order.

Options compared

There are two approaches being compared:

Lodash's min and max functions: The "old" test case uses Lodash's min and max functions to find the minimum and maximum values in the array, respectively.
JavaScript's built-in Math.min and Math.max functions: The "new" test case uses JavaScript's built-in Math.min and Math.max functions to achieve the same result.

Pros and cons of each approach

Lodash's min and max functions

Pros:

Simplifies the code and makes it more concise
Can be a good choice when working with large datasets or complex calculations

Cons:

Requires an additional library to be included in the HTML file (in this case, Lodash)
May have slower performance due to the overhead of calling a function and loading a library

JavaScript's built-in Math.min and Math.max functions

Pros:

Fastest option, as it only requires arithmetic operations
No additional libraries or overhead needed

Cons:

Can be less readable and more verbose than using Lodash's functions
May require more manual error handling (e.g., handling edge cases where the array is empty)

Other considerations

Both test cases use a similar approach to create the new array, which is efficient in terms of time complexity. However, JavaScript's built-in Math.min and Math.max functions may have a slight performance advantage due to their native implementation.

Library: Lodash.js

Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a set of useful functions for working with arrays, objects, and other data structures. In this test case, Lodash's min and max functions are used to simplify the code and make it more concise. The library is included in the HTML file using a script tag.

Special JS feature: None

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that would require additional explanation.

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in this benchmark.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents two test cases, labeled as "old" and "new", which are designed to measure the performance difference between using Lodash's `min` and `max` functions versus using JavaScript's built-in `Math.min` and `Math.max` functions. The test case creates an array of 1000 random integers between 0 and 10,000, and then uses these functions to create a new array with the values in ascending order.

**Options compared**

There are two approaches being compared:

1. **Lodash's min and max functions**: The "old" test case uses Lodash's `min` and `max` functions to find the minimum and maximum values in the array, respectively.
2. **JavaScript's built-in Math.min and Math.max functions**: The "new" test case uses JavaScript's built-in `Math.min` and `Math.max` functions to achieve the same result.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

**Lodash's min and max functions**

Pros:

* Simplifies the code and makes it more concise
* Can be a good choice when working with large datasets or complex calculations

Cons:

* Requires an additional library to be included in the HTML file (in this case, Lodash)
* May have slower performance due to the overhead of calling a function and loading a library

**JavaScript's built-in Math.min and Math.max functions**

Pros:

* Fastest option, as it only requires arithmetic operations
* No additional libraries or overhead needed

Cons:

* Can be less readable and more verbose than using Lodash's functions
* May require more manual error handling (e.g., handling edge cases where the array is empty)

**Other considerations**

Both test cases use a similar approach to create the new array, which is efficient in terms of time complexity. However, JavaScript's built-in `Math.min` and `Math.max` functions may have a slight performance advantage due to their native implementation.

**Library: Lodash.js**

Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides a set of useful functions for working with arrays, objects, and other data structures. In this test case, Lodash's `min` and `max` functions are used to simplify the code and make it more concise. The library is included in the HTML file using a script tag.

**Special JS feature: None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that would require additional explanation.

Related benchmarks:

Labels (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: old vs new

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

old

new

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):