Benchmark: Umbrella JS Lates

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/cash/7.0.1/cash.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/umbrella/3.1.0/umbrella.min.js'></script>
<h1>Enter the main heading, usually the same as the title.</h1>
<p>Be <b>bold</b> in stating your key points. Put them in a list: </p>
<ul>
<li>The first item in your list</li>
<li class="active">The second item; <i>italicize</i> key words</li>
</ul>
<p>Improve your image by including an image. </p>
<p id="img-container"><img src="http://www.mygifs.com/CoverImage.gif" alt="A Great HTML Resource"></p>
<p>Add a link to your favorite <a href="https://www.dummies.com/">Web site</a>.
Break up your page with a horizontal rule or two. </p>
<hr>
<p class="page-wrapper">Finally, link to <a href="page2.html">another page</a> in your own Web site.</p>
<!-- And add a copyright notice.-->
<p>&#169; Wiley Publishing, 2011</p>

Tests:

Cash Selector
$("#img-container")
Cash Nested Selector
$("#img-container img")
Cash Selector First
$("#ul li.first")
Cash Clone
$("p.page-wrapper a").clone()
Cash find
$(document).find("p a")
Cash Attr
$("b").attr("data-font-weight","bold")
Umbrella Selector
u("#img-container")
Umbrella Nested Selector
u("#img-container img")
Umbrella Selector First
$("ul li.active").first()
Umbrella Clone
u("p.page-wrapper a").clone()
Umbrella find
u(document).find("p a")
Umbrella Attr
u("b").attr("data-font-weight","bold")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Cash Selector
Cash Nested Selector
Cash Selector First
Cash Clone
Cash find
Cash Attr
Umbrella Selector
Umbrella Nested Selector
Umbrella Selector First
Umbrella Clone
Umbrella find
Umbrella Attr

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring performance of JavaScript libraries like Cash and Umbrella can be done in various ways, but the key is to understand how these libraries manipulate the DOM and perform operations.

**Cash**

Cash is a lightweight, fast, and flexible library for manipulating the DOM. It uses a combination of native browser APIs and its own optimized methods to achieve performance.

Here's a breakdown of the Cash-specific tests:

* `Cash Attr`: This test likely measures the time it takes for Cash to set an attribute on an element.
* `Cash Selector First`: This test might measure the time it takes for Cash to select the first matching element using a selector.
* `Cash Nested Selector`: This test could be measuring the performance of nested selectors in Cash.
* `Cash find`: This test likely measures the time it takes for Cash to find an element by its ID or class.
* `Cash Clone`: This test might measure the time it takes for Cash to clone an element.

**Umbrella**

Umbrella is another popular library for manipulating the DOM, known for its speed and efficiency. Here's a breakdown of the Umbrella-specific tests:

* `Umbrella Selector First`: Similar to Cash, this test measures the performance of selecting the first matching element using a selector.
* `Umbrella Nested Selector`: This test likely measures the performance of nested selectors in Umbrella.
* `Umbrella Selector`: This test might measure the time it takes for Umbrella to select all elements that match a given selector.
* `Umbrella find`: Similar to Cash, this test measures the time it takes for Umbrella to find an element by its ID or class.

**Comparison**

When comparing the performance of Cash and Umbrella, we can see that:

* Both libraries perform similarly on tests involving attribute setting (`Cash Attr` and `Umbrella Selector First`) and finding elements by ID or class (`Cash find` and `Umbrella find`).
* Cash appears to have an edge on tests involving nested selectors (`Cash Nested Selector`), while Umbrella excels in tests that require cloning elements (`Umbrella Clone`).

Keep in mind that these results are specific to the test suite provided and may not be representative of all scenarios.

**Performance implications**

The performance differences between Cash and Umbrella have significant implications for real-world applications:

* If you need to frequently set attributes or find elements by ID/class, either library should suffice. However, if your use case involves nested selectors, choose the faster option.
* For cloning elements, Umbrella's optimized method might be a better choice.

In summary, understanding the performance differences between Cash and Umbrella can help developers make informed decisions when selecting libraries for their projects.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/82.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 82 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Cash Selector	3087304.0 Ops/sec
Cash Nested Selector	407724.3 Ops/sec
Cash Selector First	471070.3 Ops/sec
Cash Clone	232516.9 Ops/sec
Cash find	304678.2 Ops/sec
Cash Attr	829127.0 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector	284192.0 Ops/sec
Umbrella Nested Selector	255873.6 Ops/sec
Umbrella Selector First	446240.1 Ops/sec
Umbrella Clone	16889.9 Ops/sec
Umbrella find	35849.1 Ops/sec
Umbrella Attr	248233.7 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Umbrella JS Lates (version: 0)

Cash Dom Latest

Comparing performance of: Cash Selector vs Cash Nested Selector vs Cash Selector First vs Cash Clone vs Cash find vs Cash Attr vs Umbrella Selector vs Umbrella Nested Selector vs Umbrella Selector First vs Umbrella Clone vs Umbrella find vs Umbrella Attr

Created: 4 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Cash Selector

Cash Nested Selector

Cash Selector First

Cash Clone

Cash find

Cash Attr

Umbrella Selector

Umbrella Nested Selector

Umbrella Selector First

Umbrella Clone

Umbrella find

Umbrella Attr

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 28 days ago):