<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var MyArr = Array.from({length: 40}, () => Math.floor(Math.random() * 40));
var myCopy = null;
myCopy = _.uniqBy(MyArr);
myCopy = [new Set(MyArr)]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash uniqBy | |
Set |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash uniqBy | 1502185.2 Ops/sec |
Set | 1027465.4 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test, specifically comparing two approaches for removing duplicates from an array: using Lodash's uniqBy
function and creating a Set object.
What is being tested?
In this benchmark, we have two main variables:
MyArr
: an array of 40 random numbers generated using Math.random()
and Array.from()
.myCopy
: the resulting array after removing duplicates.The test case consists of two sub-cases:
uniqBy
function to remove duplicates from MyArr
. The purpose of this approach is to demonstrate how a library like Lodash can simplify the process of finding unique elements in an array.MyArr
, which automatically removes duplicate values. The purpose of this approach is to show how creating a set from an array can be an efficient way to remove duplicates.Options compared
The two options being compared are:
uniqBy
functionThese approaches differ in several ways:
uniqBy
is designed to remove duplicates based on a specific predicate function, whereas creating a Set simply checks for duplicate values.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of each approach:
Library usage - Lodash
The uniqBy
function is part of the Lodash library, which provides a set of utility functions for various tasks. In this context, uniqBy
takes an array and a predicate function as input, returning a new array with unique elements based on the provided criteria. The library's purpose is to simplify common operations like removing duplicates.
Special JS feature or syntax
This benchmark doesn't appear to use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would impact its performance or execution. However, if we were to modify the test case to include such features, it might involve things like:
for...of
loops instead of array methodsmap()
, filter()
) for comparisonFor this specific benchmark, those approaches would likely have a negligible impact on the results.
Other alternatives
Some alternative approaches to removing duplicates from an array include:
filter()
with a callback function: Applying a callback function to each element in the array, filtering out those that don't meet certain conditions.reduce()
or other aggregation functions: Using accumulator-based functions like reduce()
or some()
to find unique elements.These alternatives might not be as efficient as using an external library like Lodash or creating a Set object, but they could provide insight into different implementation strategies for solving the problem.