<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var MyObject = {
description: 'Creates a deep copy of source, which should be an object or an array.',
myNumber: 123456789,
myBoolean: true,
jayson: {
stringify: 'JSON.stringify() method converts a JavaScript value to a JSON string....',
parse: 'JSON.parse() method parses a JSON string...'
}
};
var myCopy = null;
myCopy = _.cloneDeep(MyObject);
myCopy = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(MyObject));
myCopy = {MyObject};
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash cloneDeep | |
Json clone | |
Obj Clone |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash cloneDeep | 539986.4 Ops/sec |
Json clone | 292578.7 Ops/sec |
Obj Clone | 5099705.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the benchmark.
What is tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test that compares three approaches to create a deep copy of an object:
cloneDeep
is a function that creates a deep copy of an object.JSON.stringify()
and JSON.parse()
functions to create a deep copy of an object.{...}
) to create a shallow copy, but it can be modified to work with deep copying by using Object.assign()
or other methods.Options compared
The benchmark compares the execution time of each approach:
JSON.stringify()
and JSON.parse()
)Pros and Cons
Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each approach:
Library usage
Lodash is used in the cloneDeep
function, which provides a fast and efficient way to create deep copies of objects.
Special JS features or syntax
The benchmark uses the spread operator ({...}
) in the Obj Clone
approach, which is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2018. This operator allows for shorthand object creation, but it may not work correctly with all types of objects or deep copying scenarios.
Other alternatives
If you were to consider alternative approaches, some options might include:
Object.assign()
method or other methods like Array.prototype.slice()
and Object.create()
for shallow copying.Keep in mind that each approach has its trade-offs in terms of performance, simplicity, and compatibility with different JavaScript environments.