var example = 'there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon there is no spoon'
var result = example.slice(100)
var result = example.substr(100)
var result = example.substring(100)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
substr | |
substring |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 107298600.0 Ops/sec |
substr | 99509824.0 Ops/sec |
substring | 92254600.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three string slicing methods in JavaScript: slice()
, substr()
, and substring()
. The test case uses a large string with 100 characters repeated multiple times.
Options Compared
The benchmark compares the execution speed of these three methods:
slice()
: Returns a new string containing the specified number of characters.substr()
: Returns a new string containing the specified length of characters, starting at the specified index.substring()
: Returns a new string containing the specified number of characters, starting at the specified index.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons for each method:
slice()
:substr()
or substring()
because it doesn't require specifying the length.substr()
: slice()
due to the overhead of specifying the length.substring()
: substr()
.Library
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, it's likely that the JavaScript engine being tested (e.g., V8 in Node.js or SpiderMonkey in Firefox) uses some internal optimizations and implementation details to execute these methods.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The benchmark doesn't explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard language specification. It does rely on the JavaScript engine's optimization capabilities, which might include things like:
Alternatives
Other alternatives that could be used to benchmark string slicing methods might include:
indexOf()
: Instead of slicing, you could use the indexOf()
method to find the index of a specific character or substring and then slice from there.strRepeat()
(Node.js) or STRREP()
(SpiderMonkey).Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be directly comparable to the original benchmark, as they may have different performance characteristics or requirements.
I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.