Benchmark: ramda, lodash and ecmaS

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.0/ramda.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.fp.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var numbers = Array(100).fill().map((item, index) => index + 1);
var isEven = number => number % 2 === 0;

Tests:

Ramda
R.pipe(R.filter(isEven), R.map(x => x + 1))(numbers);
lodash
_.flow(_.filter(isEven),_.map(x => x + 1))(numbers);
EcmaS
numbers.filter(isEven).map(isEven);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda
lodash
EcmaS

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.124 Safari/537.36 Edg/91.0.864.67

Browser/OS: Chrome 91 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Ramda	566470.8 Ops/sec
lodash	197029.1 Ops/sec
EcmaS	327051.4 Ops/sec

ramda, lodash and ecmaS (version: 0)

check this out

Comparing performance of: Ramda vs lodash vs EcmaS

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ramda

lodash

EcmaS

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A