Benchmark: optional chaining vs lodash get

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {a: {b: {c: {d: 1}}}}

Tests:

optional chain
obj?.a?.b?.c?.d
lodash get with array
_.get(obj, ['a','b','c','d'])
lodash get with string
_.get(obj, 'a.b.c.d')

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
optional chain
lodash get with array
lodash get with string

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; Mi 9 Lite Build/QKQ1.190828.002; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/123.0.6312.118 Mobile Safari/537.36 [FB_IAB/FB4A;FBAV/455.0.0.40.107;]

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 123 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
optional chain	6198570.0 Ops/sec
lodash get with array	1834347.0 Ops/sec
lodash get with string	1126596.0 Ops/sec

optional chaining vs lodash get (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: optional chain vs lodash get with array vs lodash get with string

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

optional chain

lodash get with array

lodash get with string

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A