var string = "url(https://fiddle.jshell.net/_display/#custom-id)";
var url = "https://fiddle.jshell.net/_display/";
var result;
result = string.replace(url, '').replace('url(#', '').replace(')', '');
console.log(result)
result = string.substring(string.indexOf(url) + url.length).substring(string.indexOf("url(#") + 2).replace(')', '');
console.log(result)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Replaces | |
IndexOf + substring |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Replaces | 60235.7 Ops/sec |
IndexOf + substring | 62372.5 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in this benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for removing a specific substring from a string: replace()
and indexOf()
+ substring()
. The goal is to determine which approach is faster, more efficient, or more suitable for this particular use case.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
replace()
: This method replaces all occurrences of the specified substring with an empty string, returning a new string without the replacement. It's a simple and straightforward approach.indexOf()
+ substring()
: This approach uses the indexOf()
method to find the index of the first occurrence of the substring in the original string. It then extracts the substring starting from that index using substring()
, effectively removing it from the original string.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of each approach:
replace()
:indexOf()
+ substring()
:replace()
, as it allows for more control over the removal process, especially when working with complex substrings or Unicode characters. However, it may be slower due to the additional method calls.Library and Special JS Feature
There is no explicit library mentioned in this benchmark, but replace()
is a built-in JavaScript method that's widely supported across most browsers. The use of indexOf()
is also standard, so no special JavaScript feature or syntax is required for this test case.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other approaches, here are some additional options:
replace()
method with a regular expression to achieve similar results to indexOf()
+ substring()
. However, be aware that regular expressions can be slower and more complex than the built-in methods.String.prototype.slice()
or String.prototype.substr()
: These methods provide alternative ways to extract substrings from strings, but might not be as efficient as the approaches compared in this benchmark.Benchmark Preparation Code Explanation
The provided script preparation code sets up a variable string
with a specific value containing the target substring (url(#)
). It also defines variables url
and result
, which are used within the benchmark tests. The HTML preparation code is empty, suggesting that no additional setup or configuration is required for this benchmark.
Similarly, the individual test cases use these same variables to define the two approaches being compared: Replaces()
(using replace()
) and IndexOf + substring
(using indexOf()
+ substring()
).