Benchmark: abcdcfg - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>

<h2>
  Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,
</h2>
<p>
  consectetur adipiscing elit. Fusce maximus vel libero eu vehicula. Nullam ut sollicitudin sem. Aenean in dignissim neque. Quisque mattis massa at rhoncus sodales. Curabitur id neque sit amet ante lacinia facilisis. Praesent ullamcorper vestibulum magna, in finibus leo lacinia quis. Curabitur tempor,
  libero ac faucibus elementum, eros felis bibendum tellus, et posuere magna leo at sapien. Nam egestas metus non dictum tincidunt.
</p>
<h3>
  Aenean ornare iaculis congue.
</h3>
<p>
  Etiam sollicitudin interdum aliquet. Nullam enim mi, pharetra nec porttitor quis, mollis sit amet nisi. Curabitur porta velit et mauris aliquet, id vulputate erat commodo. Donec lacus velit, tincidunt et ante eget, sodales scelerisque risus.
</p>
<h2>
  Sed quis magna quis ante
</h2>
<p>
  egestas molestie. Sed eget sem lobortis, imperdiet purus a, tincidunt turpis. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Phasellus accumsan sed libero et vehicula. Sed scelerisque sem eget tortor dignissim,
</p>
<h2>
  Faucibus vestibulum arcu rutrum.
</h2>
<p>
  Vivamus posuere vehicula mi, ut luctus magna elementum id. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Quisque at nulla suscipit, blandit ipsum eu, gravida risus.
</p>
<h2>
  Praesent condimentum ex in gravida tempus.
</h2>
<p>
  Morbi tincidunt mi eros, vitae suscipit eros consectetur eget. Phasellus at nibh ut sem commodo tristique. Pellentesque pharetra ante non nisi laoreet hendrerit. Duis vehicula purus sit amet erat luctus varius.
</p>
<h2>
  Curabitur suscipit sed erat id eleifend.
</h2>
<p>
  Curabitur convallis mattis tortor eget sodales. Donec id nulla metus. Sed in commodo magna, eu porta orci. Sed tincidunt, lacus et aliquet venenatis, leo urna mollis libero, sed imperdiet leo neque sed odio. Suspendisse feugiat felis sit
</p>
<h3>
  amet ipsum consectetur cursus.
</h3>
<p>
  Phasellus laoreet imperdiet ipsum, nec mollis lorem facilisis a. Maecenas ornare tempor malesuada. Vestibulum diam nisl, varius id leo a, mattis facilisis purus.
</p>

Tests:

pjs
function awayanchor(){ var el = document.querySelector('#onThisPage'); var list = document.querySelectorAll('#onThisPage ul'); var elements = document.querySelectorAll('#onThisPage ul li'); var headings = document.querySelectorAll('#maincontainer h2'); Array.prototype.forEach.call(headings, function(el, i){ headings[i].setAttribute("id", headings[i].innerHTML.replace(/ /g,'-')); }); if(elements.length < 3){ el.parentNode.removeChild( el ); } };
jjq
$(function() { var list = $('#onThisPage ul'); $("#articlePage h2").each(function() { $(this).attr('id', $(this).text().replace(/ /g,'-')); $(list).append('<li><a href="#' + $(this).text().replace(/ /g,'-') + '">' + $(this).text() + '</a></li>'); }); var elements = $("#onThisPage ul li").length; if(elements < 3){ $("#onThisPage").remove(); } });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
pjs
jjq

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that contains metadata about the benchmark, such as its name and description. However, in this case, the description is empty, and there are no preparation or HTML preparation codes provided.

**Script Preparation Code**

The script preparation code is also missing. This code is typically used to set up any dependencies or libraries required for the benchmark.

**Html Preparation Code**

The HTML preparation code includes a reference to jQuery library (`<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>`) and some basic HTML content, such as headings and paragraphs.

**Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **pjs**: This benchmark definition contains a JavaScript function `awayanchor()` that performs the following operations:
	* Selects elements with IDs using `document.querySelector()` and `document.querySelectorAll()`.
	* Sets attributes on selected elements using `setAttribute()`.
	* Removes an element from the DOM if its length is less than 3.
2. **jjq**: This benchmark definition contains a jQuery-based implementation that performs similar operations:
	* Selects elements with IDs using `$('#onThisPage ul')` and `$('#articlePage h2')`.
	* Sets attributes on selected elements using `attr()` and replaces spaces in the text with hyphens.
	* Appends new list items to an unordered list (`<ul>`) if the length of the list is less than 3.

**Libraries**

The jQuery library is used in both benchmark definitions. Its purpose is to provide a convenient way to select elements, manipulate their attributes, and interact with the DOM.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that the use of `Array.prototype.forEach()` in the `awayanchor()` function is a standard JavaScript feature.

**Other Alternatives**

If you were to rewrite these benchmarks using alternative libraries or frameworks, here are some possibilities:

* Instead of jQuery, you could use vanilla JavaScript's `document.querySelectorAll()` and `window.addEventListener()` methods.
* If you wanted to avoid the overhead of jQuery, you could use other libraries like Lodash or Ramda for utility functions.
* Alternatively, if you were using a different framework like React or Angular, you might need to rewrite these benchmarks using their respective APIs.

Overall, this benchmark appears to be testing the performance of JavaScript's DOM manipulation capabilities, specifically the use of `document.querySelector()`, `setAttribute()`, and `removeChild()` methods. The inclusion of jQuery in both benchmark definitions suggests that it may be used as a comparison or baseline for measuring performance.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/82.0.4067.1 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 82 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
pjs	61119284.0 Ops/sec
jjq	837.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

abcdcfg (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: pjs vs jjq

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

pjs

jjq

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):