Benchmark: luxon vs datefns

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/luxon@1.22.0/build/global/luxon.min.js" integrity="sha256-9nOzQsMIG12Bislqz+VUSDS8iyP0q4iCy1FfzoRvbXY=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://igor.moomers.org/random/datefns.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.ds = "2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00";

Tests:

datefns
window.datefns.parseISO(window.ds)
luxon
luxon.DateTime.fromISO(ds);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
datefns
luxon

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/117.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 117 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
datefns	663591.0 Ops/sec
luxon	469490.7 Ops/sec

luxon vs datefns (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: datefns vs luxon

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

datefns

luxon

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A