var replacementTags = ['Hola', 'A', 'B', 'Adios'];
var customLocalTags = [];
replacementTags.forEach((tag) => {
customTag = {
value: tag,
name: tag
};
customLocalTags.push(customTag);
});
customLocalTags = replacementTags.map((tag) => {
return {
value: tag,
name: tag
};
});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
forEach | |
map |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
forEach | 347113.1 Ops/sec |
map | 3459118.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined by two test cases, which are actually examples of JavaScript methods: map
and forEach
. The benchmark itself is not explicitly defined, but we can infer its purpose from the code.
In the first test case, map
, a function is created to transform each element in an array. In this specific example, it returns an object with two properties: value
and name
, where both are set to the current element of the array (tag
). The transformed elements are then pushed onto another array, customLocalTags
.
In the second test case, forEach
, a similar transformation is applied to each element in the replacementTags
array. However, instead of creating an object and pushing it to an array, it assigns the result directly to a variable named customTag
. This assignment operation might be more relevant to measuring execution speed.
Options Compared
The two test cases are compared by executing them on the same input data: the replacementTags
array. The difference lies in how the transformation is applied:
Pros and Cons
map:
Pros:
Cons:
customLocalTags
array, which might not be significant but still adds overhead.forEach:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used
There is no explicit library used in these test cases. The map
and forEach
methods are built-in JavaScript functions.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The map
method uses a modern JavaScript feature called "arrow functions" (=>
) for conciseness, which is part of ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It's not necessary to have deep knowledge of this feature to understand the code. However, being aware of its existence can help with benchmarking and performance analysis.
Other Alternatives
To measure similar performance characteristics, you might consider using other JavaScript methods or techniques, such as:
forEach
for manual iteration.map
and forEach
.Keep in mind that the choice of alternative implementation will depend on your specific requirements, such as performance optimization or simplifying code.