var isISO6391Reg = /^(aa|ab|ae|af|ak|am|an|ar|as|av|ay|az|az|ba|be|bg|bh|bi|bm|bn|bo|br|bs|ca|ce|ch|co|cr|cs|cu|cv|cy|da|de|dv|dz|ee|el|en|eo|es|et|eu|fa|ff|fi|fj|fo|fr|fy|ga|gd|gl|gn|gu|gv|ha|he|hi|ho|hr|ht|hu|hy|hz|ia|id|ie|ig|ii|ik|io|is|it|iu|ja|jv|ka|kg|ki|kj|kk|kl|km|kn|ko|kr|ks|ku|kv|kw|ky|la|lb|lg|li|ln|lo|lt|lu|lv|mg|mh|mi|mk|ml|mn|mr|ms|mt|my|na|nb|nd|ne|ng|nl|nn|no|nr|nv|ny|oc|oj|om|or|os|pa|pi|pl|ps|pt|qu|rm|rn|ro|ru|rw|sa|sc|sd|se|sg|si|sk|sl|sm|sn|so|sq|sr|ss|st|su|sv|sw|ta|te|tg|th|ti|tk|tl|tn|to|tr|ts|tt|tw|ty|ug|uk|ur|uz|ve|vi|vo|wa|wo|xh|yi|yo|za|zh|zu)$/i;var isISO6391Arr = ['aa', 'ab', 'ae', 'af', 'ak', 'am', 'an', 'ar', 'as', 'av', 'ay', 'az', 'az', 'ba', 'be', 'bg', 'bh', 'bi', 'bm', 'bn', 'bo', 'br', 'bs', 'ca', 'ce', 'ch', 'co', 'cr', 'cs', 'cu', 'cv', 'cy', 'da', 'de', 'dv', 'dz', 'ee', 'el', 'en', 'eo', 'es', 'et', 'eu', 'fa', 'ff', 'fi', 'fj', 'fo', 'fr', 'fy', 'ga', 'gd', 'gl', 'gn', 'gu', 'gv', 'ha', 'he', 'hi', 'ho', 'hr', 'ht', 'hu', 'hy', 'hz', 'ia', 'id', 'ie', 'ig', 'ii', 'ik', 'io', 'is', 'it', 'iu', 'ja', 'jv', 'ka', 'kg', 'ki', 'kj', 'kk', 'kl', 'km', 'kn', 'ko', 'kr', 'ks', 'ku', 'kv', 'kw', 'ky', 'la', 'lb', 'lg', 'li', 'ln', 'lo', 'lt', 'lu', 'lv', 'mg', 'mh', 'mi', 'mk', 'ml', 'mn', 'mr', 'ms', 'mt', 'my', 'na', 'nb', 'nd', 'ne', 'ng', 'nl', 'nn', 'no', 'nr', 'nv', 'ny', 'oc', 'oj', 'om', 'or', 'os', 'pa', 'pi', 'pl', 'ps', 'pt', 'qu', 'rm', 'rn', 'ro', 'ru', 'rw', 'sa', 'sc', 'sd', 'se', 'sg', 'si', 'sk', 'sl', 'sm', 'sn', 'so', 'sq', 'sr', 'ss', 'st', 'su', 'sv', 'sw', 'ta', 'te', 'tg', 'th', 'ti', 'tk', 'tl', 'tn', 'to', 'tr', 'ts', 'tt', 'tw', 'ty', 'ug', 'uk', 'ur', 'uz', 've', 'vi', 'vo', 'wa', 'wo', 'xh', 'yi', 'yo', 'za', 'zh', 'zu'];var isISO6391Set = new Set(['aa', 'ab', 'ae', 'af', 'ak', 'am', 'an', 'ar', 'as', 'av', 'ay', 'az', 'az', 'ba', 'be', 'bg', 'bh', 'bi', 'bm', 'bn', 'bo', 'br', 'bs', 'ca', 'ce', 'ch', 'co', 'cr', 'cs', 'cu', 'cv', 'cy', 'da', 'de', 'dv', 'dz', 'ee', 'el', 'en', 'eo', 'es', 'et', 'eu', 'fa', 'ff', 'fi', 'fj', 'fo', 'fr', 'fy', 'ga', 'gd', 'gl', 'gn', 'gu', 'gv', 'ha', 'he', 'hi', 'ho', 'hr', 'ht', 'hu', 'hy', 'hz', 'ia', 'id', 'ie', 'ig', 'ii', 'ik', 'io', 'is', 'it', 'iu', 'ja', 'jv', 'ka', 'kg', 'ki', 'kj', 'kk', 'kl', 'km', 'kn', 'ko', 'kr', 'ks', 'ku', 'kv', 'kw', 'ky', 'la', 'lb', 'lg', 'li', 'ln', 'lo', 'lt', 'lu', 'lv', 'mg', 'mh', 'mi', 'mk', 'ml', 'mn', 'mr', 'ms', 'mt', 'my', 'na', 'nb', 'nd', 'ne', 'ng', 'nl', 'nn', 'no', 'nr', 'nv', 'ny', 'oc', 'oj', 'om', 'or', 'os', 'pa', 'pi', 'pl', 'ps', 'pt', 'qu', 'rm', 'rn', 'ro', 'ru', 'rw', 'sa', 'sc', 'sd', 'se', 'sg', 'si', 'sk', 'sl', 'sm', 'sn', 'so', 'sq', 'sr', 'ss', 'st', 'su', 'sv', 'sw', 'ta', 'te', 'tg', 'th', 'ti', 'tk', 'tl', 'tn', 'to', 'tr', 'ts', 'tt', 'tw', 'ty', 'ug', 'uk', 'ur', 'uz', 've', 'vi', 'vo', 'wa', 'wo', 'xh', 'yi', 'yo', 'za', 'zh', 'zu']);isISO6391Arr.indexOf('zu');isISO6391Arr.includes('zu');isISO6391Reg.test('zu');isISO6391Set.has('zu')--enable-precise-memory-info flag.
| Test case name | Result |
|---|---|
| IndexOf | |
| Includes | |
| Regex | |
| Set has |
| Test name | Executions per second |
|---|---|
| IndexOf | 3536715.2 Ops/sec |
| Includes | 3538177.0 Ops/sec |
| Regex | 31641454.0 Ops/sec |
| Set has | 124998856.0 Ops/sec |
It seems like you're describing a benchmarking test for the isISO6391Arr, includes method, and related functions in JavaScript. The test appears to be checking the performance of different methods for finding specific strings within an array or set.
Given the data provided, here's my interpretation:
Test Cases
The test cases seem to be verifying the performance of three different methods:
indexOf method is able to find a string in the isISO6391Arr array.includes method is able to find a string in the isISO6391Arr array, which seems to be an alias for indexOf.isISO6391Reg) can correctly identify strings within the isISO6391Arr array.has method of a set (not explicitly shown in the data) is able to find a string within the isISO6391Arr array.Results
The latest benchmark results show varying performance across different browsers and devices, indicating that the tests are not only checking for correctness but also measuring execution speed:
indexOf and includes.Suggestions
Considering these results and test cases, I'd like to offer some suggestions:
set.has by using more efficient data structures or algorithms.Feel free to share more context or clarify any aspects you'd like me to expand upon!
