let x = 0;
while (x < 100000) x++;
let x = 0;
while (x < 100000) ++x;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Post | |
Pre |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Post | 18799.6 Ops/sec |
Pre | 18937.2 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in this JavaScript benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The MeasureThat.net website allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents a simple benchmark with two test cases: "Pre" and "Post".
What is being tested?
The benchmark tests the performance difference between two approaches:
++x
): This approach increments the value of x
before assigning it to itself.x++
): This approach assigns a temporary value to x
, then increments the original value.Options compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches:
x
before assigning it to itself.x
, then increments the original value.Pros and Cons
Library
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided code. However, it's likely that the benchmark is using the built-in JavaScript engine, as MeasureThat.net appears to focus on microbenchmarking.
Special JS feature or syntax
Neither of the test cases uses any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond basic arithmetic operations and variable assignments.
Other alternatives
To measure performance differences between ++x
and x++
, other benchmarking approaches could include:
++x
and x++
in different programming languages, such as C++, Java, or Python.However, MeasureThat.net's focus on JavaScript makes it an excellent platform for comparing these two specific approaches.