<script
src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.js"
integrity="sha256-WpOohJOqMqqyKL9FccASB9O0KwACQJpFTUBLTYOVvVU="
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<div class="parent">
<div></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="target"></div>
</div>
var el = $('.test').parent().find('.target');
console.log(el);
var el = $('.target', '.parent');
console.log(el);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
find | |
context |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
find | 50557.2 Ops/sec |
context | 56326.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros/cons, and other considerations.
Benchmark Overview
The test measures the performance difference between two approaches: using $.find()
and using .context()
in jQuery to select an element. The script uses the jQuery library (version 3.4.1) and runs on a desktop environment with Chrome 79 browser.
Script Preparation Code
The HTML preparation code includes a <script>
tag that loads the jQuery library, ensuring it's available for use in the test.
Benchmark Definition JSON
There are two benchmark definition objects:
$.find()
to select an element.var el = $('.test').parent().find('.target');
console.log(el);
.context()
to select an element.var el = $('.target', '.parent');
console.log(el);
Comparison Options
The two options being compared are:
find()
method to traverse the DOM and find the target element within a parent container..context()
method to select an element within a specific context (in this case, the .parent
element).Pros/Cons
Library and Purpose
The jQuery library (version 3.4.1) is used in this benchmark. Its primary purpose is to simplify DOM manipulation and event handling in JavaScript applications.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no special features or syntax mentioned in the test cases, as they only use standard jQuery methods.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives for selecting elements in jQuery include:
These alternatives may offer different performance profiles or require adjustments in your code depending on the specific use case.
Other Considerations
Keep in mind that this benchmark only measures the performance difference between two specific approaches and doesn't account for other factors like:
To get a more comprehensive understanding of the performance characteristics, you may want to consider running additional benchmarks with different scenarios and configurations.