const a = []
for (let i = 0; i < 3000; i++) a.push(i)
const s = new Set()
for (let i = 0; i < 3000; i++) s.add(i)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array.push | |
set.add |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array.push | 111436.7 Ops/sec |
set.add | 14828.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark tests two different ways to add elements to an array or a Set data structure in JavaScript:
array.push
: This method adds one element to the end of an array.set.add
: This method adds one element to a Set data structure.These test cases aim to measure the performance difference between using push
on arrays and add
on Sets for large numbers of elements.
Options compared
The benchmark compares two approaches:
a.push(i)
, it adds the element i
to the end of the array.i
to a Set data structure, which automatically removes any duplicates.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary:
push
can lead to slower performance due to the need to reallocate memory and create new arrays.Library and purpose
In this benchmark, no external libraries are used beyond JavaScript's built-in Set
and Array
objects.
No special JavaScript features or syntax are required to run these tests. The focus is on the fundamental differences between push
on arrays and add
on Sets.
Other alternatives
For sets, you might consider using other data structures like:
Map
: A Map can be used as a set when keys are hashable and uniqueness is guaranteed.WeakSet
: A WeakSet is similar to a Set but doesn't prevent properties from being garbage collected.However, for simple use cases where performance matters, the built-in Set object is usually the best choice.