<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.15/lodash.min.js"></script>
var array = ['a', 'b', 'c']
_.forEach(array, (value, index) => {
console.log(value)
})
array.forEach((value, index) => {
console.log(value)
})
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.forEach | |
array.forEach |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.forEach | 132357.1 Ops/sec |
array.forEach | 139154.8 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
What is tested:
The benchmark tests two different approaches to iterate over an array in JavaScript: lodash.forEach
and array.forEach
.
Options compared:
(value, index) => {...}
.Pros and Cons of each approach:
Library: The Lodash library is a popular utility belt for functional programming in JavaScript. It provides a wide range of functions for tasks such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and more.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are no specific special features or syntax used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that both _.forEach
and array.forEach
use the same callback syntax, which is a fundamental concept in JavaScript iteration.
Other alternatives:
for...of
, for...in
, and map()
. Each has its own trade-offs and use cases.When deciding between _.forEach and array.forEach, consider the following:
array.forEach
is a suitable alternative.