var str = 'abc';
str = str.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * 3));
function test (str) {
switch (str) {
case 'a': return 'A'; break;
case 'b': return 'B'; break;
case 'c': return 'C'; break;
}
}
console.log(test(str));
const obj = {
a: () => 'A',
b: () => 'B',
c: () => 'C'
};
console.log(obj[str]());
const obj = {
a: 'A',
b: 'B',
c: 'C'
};
console.log(obj[str]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Switch | |
Object Function | |
Object Property |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Switch | 149162.3 Ops/sec |
Object Function | 149529.0 Ops/sec |
Object Property | 150693.9 Ops/sec |
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The test compares the performance of three different approaches:
if-else
statement with a switch
keyword to handle different cases.Options Compared
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
switch
statement.Library Used
None explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, some libraries might be used indirectly by the frameworks or environments running the benchmark tests (e.g., browser-specific APIs).
Special JS Feature/ Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark test case.
Other Considerations
Alternatives
If you need more detailed insights into performance or other aspects of your JavaScript code, consider using:
Please keep in mind that the results of these alternatives might be different due to the specific requirements and context of your project.