Benchmark: regex-in-loop - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

outside
var reg = /foo/gi; var str = "foo...foo...abc...foo"; for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { str.match(reg); }
inside
var str = "foo...foo...abc...foo"; for (var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { str.match(/foo/gi); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
outside
inside

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.

**Benchmark Definition:**
The benchmark is designed to test the performance of regular expression (regex) matching in JavaScript, both inside and outside loops.

**Script Preparation Code:**
There is no script preparation code provided for this benchmark. This means that the test setup is likely handled by a framework or library used by MeasureThat.net.

**Html Preparation Code:**
There is also no html preparation code provided for this benchmark. This suggests that the test HTML and any necessary resources are automatically generated by the framework or library.

**Individual Test Cases:**

1. **"outside"**: In this test case, a regex literal `reg` is defined outside the loop, and then used inside a loop to match the string `str`. The regex pattern `/foo/gi` matches the substring "foo" globally (`g`) with the case-insensitive flag (`i`). The loop iterates 1000 times, calling the `match()` method on the `str` variable.

2. **"inside"**: In this test case, the same string `str` is used, but the regex pattern `/foo/gi` is defined inside the loop before each iteration. This means that a new regex object is created every time, and its variables are scoped to that specific iteration of the loop.

**Libraries and Features:**
Both test cases use built-in JavaScript features:

* `String.prototype.match()`: This method is used to match the regex pattern against the string.
* Regex literals `/.../gi` : These define the pattern to be matched, with options for case-insensitive matching (`i`) and global matching (`g`).

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Outside Loop**:
	* Pros:
		+ The regex object is created only once, outside the loop.
		+ The match() method can reuse the existing regex object without creating a new one in each iteration.
	* Cons:
		+ The performance impact of reusing an existing regex object may be negligible compared to the overhead of creating a new regex object every time.

2. **Inside Loop**:
	* Pros:
		+ Each iteration gets its own, isolated regex object, which can help with debugging and isolating issues.
		+ In some cases, the overhead of creating a new regex object in each iteration might be faster than reusing an existing one.
	* Cons:
		+ Creating a new regex object every time incurs additional overhead compared to reusing an existing one.

**Other Considerations:**

1. **Memory Usage**: The number of regex objects created and garbage collected can impact memory usage, especially if the loop runs for a long time.

2. **Security**: When using regex literals with user-provided input, there is a risk of security vulnerabilities like Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks or code injection. This test assumes that the input string `str` is safe to process and does not include any malicious patterns.

**Alternatives:**
Other alternatives for testing regular expression performance might involve:

1. **Using a custom-built regex engine**: MeasureThat.net likely uses a built-in JavaScript regex engine, but alternative implementations like SpiderMonkey or V8 could be used.
2. **Comparing different regex flavors**: Different programming languages (e.g., Java, Python) use various regex flavors with distinct features and performance characteristics.
3. **Testing regex performance in edge cases**: Test the performance of regex matching on invalid input patterns, very large strings, or other edge cases to gauge the robustness of the implementation.

Please note that this is a general analysis and the actual specifics might depend on the MeasureThat.net framework's implementation details.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:71.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/71.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 71 on Mac OS X 10.14

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
outside	5405.0 Ops/sec
inside	5203.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

regex-in-loop (version: 0)

test to test regex literal inside and outside loops

Comparing performance of: outside vs inside

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

outside

inside

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):