<div id="container"></div>
var container = document.getElementById("container");
for(var i = 0; i < 5000; i++) {
var div = document.createElement("div");
div.className = "div"
container.appendChild(div);
}
container.getElementsByClassName("div");
container.querySelectorAll(".div");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
1 | |
2 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
1 | 5287500.0 Ops/sec |
2 | 12620.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The test is comparing the performance of two DOM querying methods: getElementsByClassName
and querySelectorAll
. Both methods are used to select elements with a specific class name or selector, respectively.
What's Being Tested?
In this benchmark, we have three key variables that are being compared:
Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
getElementsByClassName
querySelectorAll
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
getElementsByClassName
:querySelectorAll
:getElementsByClassName
, as it allows for more complex selectors.Library and Its Purpose
Neither method requires any external libraries. They are built-in DOM querying methods in JavaScript.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There's no special JS feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. It's purely focused on comparing the performance of two standard DOM querying methods.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches to DOM querying, consider:
querySelector
: Similar to querySelectorAll
, but it only returns the first match.querySelectorAll
with a predicate function: Allows for more complex filtering and sorting of elements.document.querySelectorAll
with a CSS selector: Can be used to select elements based on CSS rules.In summary, this benchmark is testing the performance difference between getElementsByClassName
and querySelectorAll
, two commonly used DOM querying methods in JavaScript.