Benchmark: Template strings vs. String.concat

Script Preparation code:

const base = '1-2'
const separator = '-';
const suffix = 3;

function templateString() {
  return `${base}${something}${suffix}`;
}

function stringConcat() {
  return base.concat(separator, suffix);
}

Tests:

Template string
templateString()
String.concat
stringConcat()

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Template string
String.concat

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/88.0.4324.150 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 88 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Template string	0.0 Ops/sec
String.concat	3896232.0 Ops/sec

Template strings vs. String.concat (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Template string vs String.concat

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Template string

String.concat

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A