let array = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
array = [array, i];
}
let array = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
array.push(i);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Spread | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Spread | 6.5 Ops/sec |
Push | 13692.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and its various components.
Benchmark Definition The benchmark definition is represented by two JSON objects, each containing a JavaScript code snippet that performs a specific operation:
...
) to create a new array by copying an existing array and appending a value to it. In this case, let array = []
initializes an empty array, and the for
loop iterates 10,000 times, adding each iteration's value to the array using array = [...array, i];
.push()
method to append values to an existing array. Similar to the spread example, let array = []
initializes an empty array, and the for
loop iterates 10,000 times, adding each iteration's value to the array using array.push(i);
.Comparison of Options
The main difference between these two approaches is how they modify the original array:
Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Considerations
When deciding between these two approaches, consider the following factors:
push()
might be a better choice. However, if preserving the original array's integrity is crucial, spread()
could be more suitable.spread()
can lead to higher memory usage. If you're concerned about memory efficiency, push()
is likely a better option.Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, if you'd like to discuss other JavaScript features or libraries that could be used for similar benchmarks, please let me know!
Alternative Benchmarking Frameworks and Tools
Some popular alternatives to MeasureThat.net include:
These alternatives offer various features, such as support for multiple platforms, more advanced performance analysis, and integration with other tools. However, MeasureThat.net's simplicity and focus on JavaScript microbenchmarks make it a great starting point for many use cases.