var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
arr.length = 0;
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4];
arr = [];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
length | |
other |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
length | 19362420.0 Ops/sec |
other | 920533056.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
What is being measured?
The test case measures the performance of two different approaches to resetting an array to an empty state: setting arr.length = 0
or using the assignment operator arr = []
.
Options compared:
There are two options being compared:
arr.length = 0
: This approach sets the length property of the array to 0, effectively reducing its size.arr = []
: This approach reassigns the entire array to a new empty array.Pros and cons of each approach:
arr.length = 0
:ArrayBuffer
).arr = []
:Other considerations:
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the specific requirements of your use case. If you need to iterate over the original array elements without modifying the array itself, using arr = []
might be a better choice. However, if memory efficiency and speed are crucial, setting arr.length = 0
is likely a better option.
Library usage:
There doesn't seem to be any specific library being used in these test cases.
Special JavaScript features or syntax:
None of the provided benchmark definitions use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond standard array operations.