Benchmark: Spread vs .concat()

Script Preparation code:

var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);

Tests:

Spread
const params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] const other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
.concat()
const params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; const other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Spread
.concat()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark defines two test cases: "Spread" and ".concat()". It provides scripts for preparing data and HTML code for rendering the results.

**Script Preparation Code**

For both tests, the script preparation code is identical:
```javascript
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
```
This code creates an array `params` with three elements: a string `"hello"`, a boolean `true`, and a number `7`.

**HTML Preparation Code**

There is no HTML preparation code for this benchmark.

**Individual Test Cases**

The benchmark defines two test cases:

1. **Spread**: The benchmark definition is:
```javascript
const params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
const other = [ 1, 2, ...params ];
```
This test case uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array `other` by copying all elements from `params`.

2. **.concat()**: The benchmark definition is:
```javascript
const params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
const other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
```
This test case uses the `.concat()` method to concatenate two arrays: `[1, 2]` and `params`.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

Here's a brief analysis of both approaches:

* **Spread**: Using the spread operator has several advantages:
	+ It creates a shallow copy of the original array.
	+ It's faster than `.concat()` because it avoids creating an intermediate array.
	+ It's more memory-efficient because it doesn't require allocating additional memory for an intermediate array.
However, it may not work as expected with non-array objects or arrays with functions as elements.

* **.concat()**: Using `.concat()` has some advantages:
	+ It works with any type of iterable (not just arrays).
	+ It's often more readable and familiar to developers who are used to using `+` for concatenation.
However, it creates an intermediate array, which can lead to higher memory usage and slower performance compared to the spread operator.

**Other Considerations**

In this benchmark, the difference between the two approaches is likely due to the way JavaScript optimizes array iteration. The spread operator may be faster because it avoids creating an intermediate array, while `.concat()` may create an intermediate array that gets copied during iteration.

**Library and Special JS Features**

Neither of these tests uses any external libraries or special JavaScript features. They are basic examples of using arrays in JavaScript.

**Alternatives**

If you want to optimize your code for performance, you can explore other approaches:

* Use `Array.prototype spread` (ES6) instead of the spread operator (`...`) for a more efficient and concise solution.
* Use `concat()` with an intermediate array if you need to support older browsers or environments that don't have ES6 features.

Keep in mind that benchmarking results can vary depending on the specific JavaScript engine, platform, and other factors. It's essential to run multiple benchmarks and consider multiple factors when optimizing your code for performance.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/78.0.3904.108 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 78 on Mac OS X 10.13.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Spread	16190729.0 Ops/sec
.concat()	4548714.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Spread vs .concat() (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Spread vs .concat()

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Spread

.concat()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):