Benchmark: mój test - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

x1
const x = 1
x2
const x = 2

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
x1
x2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark.

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a simple benchmark definition, which is essentially a container for holding test cases. The `Name` field gives a human-readable name to the benchmark, while the `Description` field provides a brief description of the test. In this case, the description is empty, but it's a good practice to include a descriptive phrase or sentence.

The `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code` fields are optional and can be used to set up the environment for the benchmark. In this case, both fields are null, indicating that no specific setup is required.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case in MeasureThat.net represents a single JavaScript expression or statement being tested. The JSON array contains two individual test cases:

1. `const x = 1`
2. `const x = 2`

These test cases are likely meant to be simple arithmetic expressions, where the value of `x` is incremented by 1 and then assigned to itself.

**Benchmark Execution**

When running this benchmark, MeasureThat.net will execute each test case on a controlled environment (in this case, Firefox 69) multiple times. The actual number of executions per second is recorded for each test case:

* `TestName: "x1"` has an execution rate of approximately 942 million per second.
* `TestName: "x2"` has an execution rate of approximately 923 million per second.

**Libraries and Special Features**

In this benchmark, no specific libraries or external dependencies are mentioned. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net can run benchmarks on various JavaScript engines, including Node.js, and support for additional features like async/await might be available depending on the engine used.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in creating your own JavaScript benchmarking platform, here are some alternatives:

1. **Benchmark.js**: A popular open-source benchmarking library that provides a simple way to write and run benchmarks.
2. **jsPerf**: A cross-browser benchmarking tool that allows you to compare the performance of different JavaScript engines.
3. **Benchmarking frameworks**: Many JavaScript frameworks, such as Jest or Mocha, provide built-in support for writing and running benchmarks.

Keep in mind that creating a robust benchmarking platform requires careful consideration of factors like test case design, execution environments, and statistical analysis. MeasureThat.net likely takes care of these details for you!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:69.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 69 on Mac OS X 10.14

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
x1	942264960.0 Ops/sec
x2	923040576.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

mój test (version: 0)

test

Comparing performance of: x1 vs x2

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

x1

x2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):