var a = document.createElement('a');
a.appendChild(document.createTextNode('text'));
a.textContent = 'text';
a.innerText = 'text';
a.nodeValue = 'text';
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
createTextNode | |
textContent | |
innerText | |
nodeValue |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
createTextNode | 2913555.5 Ops/sec |
textContent | 10077985.0 Ops/sec |
innerText | 1718274.4 Ops/sec |
nodeValue | 20149554.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance of different approaches to set text content on an HTML element: createTextNode
, textContent
, innerText
, and nodeValue
. The test creates a single HTML anchor element (<a>
) using JavaScript and then sets its text content using each of these four methods.
Options Compared
document.createTextNode()
method, which is then appended to the HTML element.textContent
property (or nodeValue
in older browsers).innerText
property (or nodeValue
in older browsers).textContent
, but uses the nodeValue
property (or innerText
in older browsers) to set the text content.Pros and Cons
textContent
and nodeValue
, but might offer better performance due to optimizations in modern browsers.Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries or special JavaScript features used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some of these properties (e.g., textContent
, innerText
) are supported by Web APIs like the DOM2Core specification, which is a W3C standard.
Other Considerations
createTextNode
can lead to increased memory usage, which might impact the overall performance of the application.Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches or optimizations, consider the following:
Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be directly applicable to this specific benchmark, but they could be useful in other scenarios where similar optimizations are needed.