const arr1 = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,34,4,6,6,7,457,34,57,3457,345,73,457,3457,345,734,573,457,3,25,35,23,52,35,235,23,52,35,235,2,35,235,235,23,523,234,62,346,234,62,47,4568,678,96,80,687,067,453,63,456,45,634,563,,89,67,67,56,53,43,36,346,634,63,46,346,3,74,6784678,46,84,56,8,4,5,2,3,4,6,2346,23,46,2346,23,46,6567,8567,8,5678,56,785,6,7,8,5,6,7,85,67]
const arr2 = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,34,4,6,6,7,457,34,57,3457,345,73,457,3457,345,734,573,457,3,25,35,23,52,35,235,23,52,35,235,2,35,235,235,23,523,234,62,346,234,62,47,4568,678,96,80,687,067,453,63,456,45,634,563,,89,67,67,56,53,43,36,346,634,63,46,346,3,74,6784678,46,84,56,8,4,5,2,3,4,6,2346,23,46,2346,23,46,6567,8567,8,5678,56,785,6,7,8,5,6,7,85,67];
const arr3 = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,34,4,6,6,7,457,34,57,3457,345,73,457,3457,345,734,573,457,3,25,35,23,52,35,235,23,52,35,235,2,35,235,235,23,523];
const finalArr = [
arr1,
arr2,
arr3
]
const arr1 = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,34,4,6,6,7,457,34,57,3457,345,73,457,3457,345,734,573,457,3,25,35,23,52,35,235,23,52,35,235,2,35,235,235,23,523,234,62,346,234,62,47,4568,678,96,80,687,067,453,63,456,45,634,563,,89,67,67,56,53,43,36,346,634,63,46,346,3,74,6784678,46,84,56,8,4,5,2,3,4,6,2346,23,46,2346,23,46,6567,8567,8,5678,56,785,6,7,8,5,6,7,85,67]
const arr2 = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,34,4,6,6,7,457,34,57,3457,345,73,457,3457,345,734,573,457,3,25,35,23,52,35,235,23,52,35,235,2,35,235,235,23,523,234,62,346,234,62,47,4568,678,96,80,687,067,453,63,456,45,634,563,,89,67,67,56,53,43,36,346,634,63,46,346,3,74,6784678,46,84,56,8,4,5,2,3,4,6,2346,23,46,2346,23,46,6567,8567,8,5678,56,785,6,7,8,5,6,7,85,67];
const arr3 = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,34,4,6,6,7,457,34,57,3457,345,73,457,3457,345,734,573,457,3,25,35,23,52,35,235,23,52,35,235,2,35,235,235,23,523];
const finalArr = arr1.concat(arr2.concat(arr3))
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
spread | |
concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
spread | 884148.6 Ops/sec |
concat | 1716739.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition
The provided benchmark definition is quite simple, consisting of two test cases: spread
and concat
. The test cases are designed to compare the performance of creating an array by spreading or concatenating existing arrays.
Options Compared
In the spread
test case:
arr1
, arr2
, arr3
) are spread using the syntax ...arrX
to create a new array.concat()
method.In the concat
test case:
arr1
, arr2
, arr3
) are concatenated using the concat()
method in a nested manner (i.e., arr2.concat(arr3)
).concat()
method.Pros and Cons
Spread Method:
Pros:
Cons:
Concatenation Method:
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
Both methods have their trade-offs in terms of performance, readability, and maintainability. The spread method can be faster but may not work well with older browsers or versions of JavaScript. On the other hand, the concatenation method is more widely supported but may be slower.
Libraries Used
None are explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, it's worth noting that some libraries like Lodash provide utility functions for working with arrays, including spread
and concat
.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The spread syntax (...
) is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for more concise array creation by spreading the elements of an existing array. This syntax is widely supported across modern browsers and versions of JavaScript.
In summary, the benchmark compares the performance of creating an array using either the spread or concatenation method. The results indicate that the spread method can be faster but may not work well with older browsers or versions of JavaScript.