<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var elements = ["cat", "dog", "bat"]
_.join(elements, ' ,')
elements.join(' ,')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.join | |
array.join |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.join | 19293904.0 Ops/sec |
array.join | 19415220.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested in this specific benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two individual test cases: array.join
and _.join
. These tests compare the performance of two different ways to concatenate arrays (or strings) using either native JavaScript functions or a popular utility library, Lodash.
Options compared:
join()
method: This is a built-in method that concatenates all elements in an array into a single string..join()
function: This is a utility function from the Lodash library that provides a convenient way to concatenate arrays or strings.Pros and Cons:
join()
method:.join()
function:Library:
The _.join()
function is part of the Lodash library, which provides a comprehensive set of utility functions for tasks like array manipulation, string formatting, and more. The purpose of Lodash is to provide a convenient and consistent way to perform common operations in JavaScript, making it easier to write maintainable and efficient code.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are no specific JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of two different methods for concatenating arrays (or strings).
Other alternatives:
If you're looking for alternative ways to concatenate arrays or strings, some other options include:
"hello ${name}"
instead of "hello " + name
)Array.prototype.reduce()
to concatenate elementsKeep in mind that the choice of method often depends on the specific use case, personal preference, and performance considerations.
I hope this explanation helps!