function makeTestData() { return { name: "Matheus de Sousa Martins", age: 30, phone: "999999999999" }; }
makeTestData().toString()
JSON.stringify(makeTestData());
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
toString | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
toString | 89526736.0 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 8548921.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
What is tested?
The provided benchmark compares the performance of two ways to convert an object to a string:
toString()
: This method calls the ToString()
method on the object, which returns a string representation of the object.JSON.stringify()
: This method converts the object to a JSON string.Options compared
The two options being compared are:
toString()
: This is a built-in JavaScript method that attempts to provide a human-readable representation of an object. However, its behavior can be unpredictable and may not always produce the expected results.JSON.stringify()
: This method provides a more standardized way to convert objects to strings, following the JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) format.Pros and Cons
toString()
Pros:
Cons:
JSON.stringify()
, especially for large objects.JSON.stringify()
Pros:
toString()
for large objects.Cons:
toString()
.Library and syntax considerations
In this benchmark, no libraries are used. However, it's worth noting that JSON.stringify()
uses the Stringify
method from the JSON
object, which is part of the JavaScript standard library.
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in these benchmarks. The focus is on comparing the performance of two basic methods for converting objects to strings.
Other alternatives
If you want to explore other options, here are a few:
lodash
or json-stringify-safe
, which provide more advanced and flexible ways to convert objects to strings.json.parse()
instead of JSON.stringify()
.Object.keys()
, Object.values()
, or String.fromCharCode()
, to create a string representation of the object.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be relevant to this specific benchmark, and their performance may vary depending on the use case.