Benchmark: Ramda map vs Array.map vs for

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function double(n) {
	return n*2;
}
var data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30];

Tests:

Ramda
R.map(double, data);
Array (native)
data.map(double);
for i native
const res = []; for (let i = 0; i < data.length; i++) { res.push(double(data[i])); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ramda
Array (native)
for i native

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/76.0.3809.100 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 76 on Mac OS X 10.13.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Ramda	1450949.0 Ops/sec
Array (native)	1558523.0 Ops/sec
for i native	157832.1 Ops/sec

Ramda map vs Array.map vs for (version: 0)

measures the speed of ramda's map vs Array's native map

Comparing performance of: Ramda vs Array (native) vs for i native

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ramda

Array (native)

for i native

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A