<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.slim.min.js"></script>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test2"></div>
var el = $(".test");
var el = document.getElementsByClassName('test');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery 3.1.1 Slim | |
Vanilla JS |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery 3.1.1 Slim | 273414.8 Ops/sec |
Vanilla JS | 2500728.8 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the benchmark.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a microbenchmark that compares the speed of two approaches to retrieve an HTML element by its ID:
Options compared
In this benchmark, we have two options being compared:
document.getElementById
Pros and Cons of each approach
jQuery:
Pros:
Cons:
Vanilla JS (document.getElementById
):
Pros:
Cons:
Library: jQuery
jQuery is a widely-used JavaScript library that provides an easy-to-use API for interacting with the DOM. Its primary purpose is to simplify DOM manipulation, event handling, and Ajax requests.
In this benchmark, we're using the $(selector)
syntax to select elements by ID. This is just one of many selectors available in jQuery, but it's a popular and commonly used one.
Special JS feature/syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark that would require additional explanation.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for retrieving elements by ID, here are some options:
#id
or [id="id"]
to select elements by ID in vanilla JavaScript. This approach is more verbose than jQuery, but can be faster since it leverages the browser's CSS engine.Keep in mind that these alternatives might require additional setup or modifications to your codebase.