Benchmark: func vs js object vs symbol

Tests:

func
let a = function () { return "HELLO"; } let b = function () { return "WORLD"; } a === b
jsobj
let a = {hello: "world"} let b = {foo: "bar"} a === b
symbol
let a = Symbol("foo"); let b = Symbol("bar"); a === b

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
func
jsobj
symbol

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net!

The provided JSON represents three individual test cases, each testing different approaches to compare two expressions:

1.  **Functions**: `let a = function () { return "HELLO"; }` and `let b = function () { return "WORLD"; }`. The benchmark tests whether the equality operator (`===`) returns true for these two functions.
2.  **JavaScript Objects**: `let a = { hello: "world" }` and `let b = { foo: "bar" }`. The benchmark tests whether the equality operator (`===`) returns true for these two objects.
3.  **Symbols**: `let a = Symbol("foo")` and `let b = Symbol("bar")`. The benchmark tests whether the equality operator (`===`) returns true for these two symbols.

Now, let's discuss the pros and cons of each approach:

*   **Functions**:
    *   Pros: Functions are often used to encapsulate code in JavaScript. In this case, comparing functions might help identify potential issues with function overriding or shadowing.
    *   Cons: Functions can be more complex than objects or symbols, making them less suitable for simple equality checks.
*   **JavaScript Objects**:
    *   Pros: Objects are a fundamental data structure in JavaScript and are widely used. This approach helps test object comparison methods like `===`.
    *   Cons: Object comparison can lead to unexpected results if the properties being compared are not explicitly defined or have different data types (e.g., comparing numbers and strings).
*   **Symbols**:
    *   Pros: Symbols provide a unique way to create immutable, single-value properties in objects. This approach tests symbol comparison methods like `===`.
    *   Cons: Symbols were introduced in ECMAScript 2015, so not all browsers support them equally.

**Library and Special JS Feature:**

There are no libraries mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's essential to note that MeasureThat.net often uses libraries or frameworks to facilitate benchmarking, such as V8 JavaScript engine for running benchmarks on web pages. Additionally, some of the test cases might rely on special JavaScript features like `===` operator.

**Other Alternatives:**

If you want to create similar microbenchmarks or explore different approaches, consider the following alternatives:

1.  **Benchmarking Frameworks:** Utilize established benchmarking frameworks like Benchmark.js or V8's built-in benchmarking tools to create and run tests.
2.  **JavaScript Engines:** Experiment with running benchmarks on different JavaScript engines like SpiderMonkey (Firefox), V8 (Chrome), or JavaScriptCore (Safari).
3.  **Custom Test Cases:** Create custom test cases using your preferred programming language, focusing on specific aspects of JavaScript performance or comparison logic.

By exploring these alternatives and understanding the intricacies of JavaScript comparisons, you can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexities involved in writing efficient and reliable code.

Example Benchmark Preparation Code:
```javascript
// Function benchmark
function func() {
    return "HELLO";
}

function funcB() {
    return "WORLD";
}

console.log(func() === funcB);

// Object benchmark
const objA = { hello: "world" };
const objB = { foo: "bar" };

console.log(objA === objB);

// Symbol benchmark
const symA = Symbol("foo");
const symB = Symbol("bar");

console.log(symA === symB);
```

These code snippets provide a starting point for your own benchmarking experiments. Remember to carefully consider the test cases, execution environments, and potential edge cases when designing your benchmarks.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 130 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
func	128854032.0 Ops/sec
jsobj	119549328.0 Ops/sec
symbol	4286553.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

func vs js object vs symbol (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: func vs jsobj vs symbol

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

func

jsobj

symbol

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):