Benchmark: ES6 Map Merge vs forEach

Script Preparation code:

const entries1 = [];
const entries2 = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  entries1[i] = [i , i];
}
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
  entries2[i] = [i + 500, i + 600];
}
const pathSegmentMap = new Map(entries1);
const newSegmentMap = new Map(entries2);

Tests:

Merge
const entries1 = []; const entries2 = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { entries1[i] = [i , i]; } for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { entries2[i] = [i + 500, i + 600]; } const pathSegmentMap = new Map(entries1); const newSegmentMap = new Map(entries2); const mergeMap = new Map([...pathSegmentMap, ...newSegmentMap]);
Loop
const entries1 = []; const entries2 = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { entries1[i] = [i , i]; } for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { entries2[i] = [i + 500, i + 600]; } const pathSegmentMap = new Map(entries1); const newSegmentMap = new Map(entries2); newSegmentMap.forEach((value, key) => { pathSegmentMap.set(key, value); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Merge
Loop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 28 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Merge	6598.1 Ops/sec
Loop	10383.0 Ops/sec

ES6 Map Merge vs forEach (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Merge vs Loop

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Merge

Loop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A