var arr = [ 1, 2, 4 ];
arr.push(6);
var arr = [ 1, 2, 4 ];
arr = [arr, 6];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
push | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
push | 81019216.0 Ops/sec |
spread | 13392446.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of different approaches.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two methods for pushing an element onto an array in JavaScript:
push()
methodarr = [...arr, 6];
)Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
push()
: The traditional method of appending a new element to an array using the push()
function.Pros and Cons
Push() Method
Pros:
Cons:
Spread Syntax (ES6)
Pros:
Cons:
Library Use
There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, if we look at the test cases, we can see that both push()
and spread syntax use a single array variable (arr
) and modify its length.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The spread syntax uses the new syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This syntax allows creating a new array by spreading an existing array and adding a new element. The exact syntax used is arr = [...arr, 6];
.
Other Alternatives
Before the spread syntax was introduced, developers might have used other methods to achieve similar results, such as:
concat()
method: var arr = [1, 2, 4].concat([6])
Array
constructor and pushing the element manually: var arr = new Array(3).fill(0).map((_, i) => { if (i == 1) return 6; });
These alternatives are less efficient than the spread syntax, but still viable options for older browsers or versions that don't support ES6.
In summary, the benchmark measures the performance difference between two methods for pushing an element onto an array in JavaScript: push()
and spread syntax. The spread syntax is generally faster and more concise, but requires ECMAScript 2015 or later support.