Benchmark: JQuery Mobile 1.4.5 Load Speed On Jquery 2.2.4 3-cases

HTML Preparation code:

<head>
    <title>Hello World!</title> 
  	<script src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.2.4/jquery.min.js'></script>
	<script src='//code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.js'></script>
 	<link rel="stylesheet" href="//code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.css" />
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> 
</head>
<body> 
<div data-role="page">
    <div data-role="header">
        <h1>Curonsys</h1>
    </div>
    <div data-role="content"> 
        <p>Hello world</p>
    </div>
  	<ul id="mylist" data-role="listview" data-inset="true" data-theme="d" data-divider-theme="e" data-count-theme="b">
		<li data-role="list-divider">Divider</li>
		<li><a href="#">Inbox <span class="ui-li-count">12</span></a></li>
		<li><a href="#">Outbox <span class="ui-li-count">0</span></a></li>
		<li><a href="#">Sent <span class="ui-li-count">328</span></a></li>
      	<input type="button" value="http://curonsys.com" id="curo" class="myButton" data-inline="true"/>
    	<input type="button" value="http://naver.com" id="nav" class="myButton" data-inline="true"/>
	</ul>
</div>
</body>

Script Preparation code:

var dirName;
var isRel;
var parseLocation;

Tests:

path
$(document).ready(function() { dirName = $.mobile.path.get($('curo').attr('value')); });
url
$(document).ready(function() { isRel = $.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl($('nav').attr('value')); });
parseLocation
$(document).ready(function() { parseLocation = $.mobile.path.parseLocation(); });

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
path
url
parseLocation

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 109 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
path	115206.1 Ops/sec
url	353414.2 Ops/sec
parseLocation	139498.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark, named "JQuery Mobile 1.4.5 Load Speed On Jquery 2.2.4 3-cases", is designed to measure the performance of three specific JavaScript functions related to URL manipulation: `$.mobile.path.get()`, `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl()`, and `$.mobile.path.parseLocation()`.

**Test Cases**

There are three test cases, each measuring a different aspect of the three functions:

1. **`path`**: Measures the execution time of `$.mobile.path.get()`. This function is used to extract the path from a URL string.
2. **`url`**: Measures the execution time of `$.mobile.path.isRelativeUrl()`. This function determines whether a given URL is relative or absolute.
3. **`parseLocation`**: Measures the execution time of `$.mobile.path.parseLocation()`. This function parses a URL and extracts its components, such as protocol, hostname, path, and query string.

**Library: jQuery Mobile**

The benchmark uses the jQuery Mobile library, which is a popular JavaScript framework for building mobile web applications. The specific versions used in this benchmark are:

* jQuery: 2.2.4
* jQuery Mobile: 1.4.5

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax used in the benchmark, except for the use of dollar signs (`$`) as a shorthand for `jQuery`, which is a common convention in jQuery code.

**Pros and Cons of Approaches**

The three test cases measure different aspects of URL manipulation, each with its pros and cons:

1. **`path`**: Pros: Simple and straightforward function to extract path from URL string. Cons: May not be as relevant for modern web applications that use more complex URL structures.
2. **`url`**: Pros: Determines whether a URL is relative or absolute, which can be important for routing and navigation in web applications. Cons: May not be as fast as other approaches, depending on the complexity of the URL string.
3. **`parseLocation`**: Pros: Parses a full URL and extracts its components, making it more useful for modern web applications that use complex URL structures. Cons: More computationally expensive than `path`, which may impact performance.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're looking to measure similar aspects of URL manipulation in JavaScript, you might consider using other libraries or frameworks, such as:

* DOM parsing libraries like `URL` or `parseUrl`
* String manipulation libraries like `string-parse` or `url-parser`

Keep in mind that these alternatives may not provide the same level of specificity and relevance as jQuery Mobile's `$mobile.path` functions.

Overall, the benchmark provides a useful comparison of three specific JavaScript functions related to URL manipulation, which can help developers understand performance characteristics of their code.

Related benchmarks:

JQuery Mobile 1.4.5 Load Speed On Jquery 2.2.4 3-cases (version: 0)

jinungcho20190628

Comparing performance of: path vs url vs parseLocation

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

path

url

parseLocation

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):