Benchmark: speedtestjqm - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<head>
    <title>My Page</title> 
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> 
    <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
</head>
<body> 
<div data-role="page">
    <div data-role="header">
        <h1>My Title</h1>
    </div>
    <div data-role="content"> 
        <p>Hello world</p>
    </div>
</div>
</body>

AخA
 
<head>
    <title>My Page</title> 
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/> 
    <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
</head>
<body> 
<div data-role="page">
    <div data-role="header">
        <h1>My Title</h1>
    </div>
    <div data-role="content"> 
        <p>Hello world</p>
    </div>
</div>
</body>

Script Preparation code:

function loadScript(url, callback) {
	var script = document.createElement('script');
	script.src = url;
	script.onload = callback;
	document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script);
}
var myloaded = function() {
	document.write(str);
}

 
function loadScript(url, callback) {    var script = document.createElement('script');    script.src = url;    script.onload = callback;    document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script);}var myloaded = function() {    document.write(str);}

Tests:

145
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.js', myloaded);
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.js', myloaded);
132
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.3.2/jquery.mobile-1.3.2.min.js', myloaded);
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.3.2/jquery.mobile-1.3.2.min.js', myloaded);
112
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.1.2/jquery.mobile-1.1.2.min.js', myloaded);
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.1.2/jquery.mobile-1.1.2.min.js', myloaded);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Experimental features:

Memory measurements supported only in Chrome.
For precise memory measurements Chrome must be launched with --enable-precise-memory-info flag.
More information: Monitoring JavaScript Memory

Test case name	Result
145
132
112

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/75.0.3770.100 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 75 on Windows 7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
145	3695.0 Ops/sec
132	1749.4 Ops/sec
112	1401.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 5 months ago):

Benchmark Overview

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark tests the execution speed of different versions of jQuery Mobile.

Script Preparation Code and HTML Preparation Code

The Script Preparation Code is responsible for loading external scripts into the HTML page:

function loadScript(url, callback) {
    var script = document.createElement('script');
    script.src = url;
    script.onload = callback;
    document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script);
}

var myloaded = function() {
    document.write(str); // Note: str is not defined in this code snippet
};

The HTML Preparation Code sets up the basic structure of the web page:

<head>
    <title>My Page</title>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/>
    <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
</head>

<body>
    <div data-role="page">
        <div data-role="header">
            <h1>My Title</h1>
        </div>
        <div data-role="content">
            <p>Hello world</p>
        </div>
    </div>
</body>

The HTML includes the jQuery library, which is loaded using the loadScript function.

Individual Test Cases

Each test case consists of a single benchmark definition in the format:

loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.js', myloaded);

The myloaded function is called when the script loads, but its purpose is unclear without more context.

Library: jQuery Mobile

jQuery Mobile is a touch-enabled HTML5 web application framework for mobile devices. Its primary features include:

Touch-friendly UI components
Mobile-optimized layouts
JavaScript events handling

In this benchmark, jQuery Mobile versions 1.4.5, 1.3.2, and 1.1.2 are being tested.

Special JS Feature/ Syntax: None

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in the provided code snippets.

Pros and Cons of Different Approaches

The different approaches being compared here are:

Loading external scripts using loadScript
Using a library like jQuery Mobile

Advantages of using loadScript:

Flexibility to load custom scripts
Can be useful for testing specific scripts or libraries

Disadvantages of using loadScript:

May introduce security risks if not used carefully (e.g., loading malicious scripts)
Can lead to slower page loads if too many scripts are loaded

Advantages of using a library like jQuery Mobile:

Provides pre-built, tested components and functionality
Can save time and effort in development

Disadvantages of using a library like jQuery Mobile:

May introduce additional dependencies and complexity
Can limit flexibility and customization options

Other Alternatives

Other alternatives to loading external scripts or using libraries like jQuery Mobile might include:

Using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to load scripts and assets
Implementing a modular architecture for script loading and execution
Utilizing a testing framework specifically designed for JavaScript performance benchmarking

Note that the specific alternative solutions will depend on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark tests the execution speed of different versions of jQuery Mobile.

**Script Preparation Code and HTML Preparation Code**

The Script Preparation Code is responsible for loading external scripts into the HTML page:
```javascript
function loadScript(url, callback) {
    var script = document.createElement('script');
    script.src = url;
    script.onload = callback;
    document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(script);
}

var myloaded = function() {
    document.write(str); // Note: str is not defined in this code snippet
};
```
The HTML Preparation Code sets up the basic structure of the web page:
```html
<head>
    <title>My Page</title>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"/>
    <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>
</head>

<body>
    <div data-role="page">
        <div data-role="header">
            <h1>My Title</h1>
        </div>
        <div data-role="content">
            <p>Hello world</p>
        </div>
    </div>
</body>
```
The HTML includes the jQuery library, which is loaded using the `loadScript` function.

**Individual Test Cases**

Each test case consists of a single benchmark definition in the format:
```javascript
loadScript('http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.4.5/jquery.mobile-1.4.5.min.js', myloaded);
```
The `myloaded` function is called when the script loads, but its purpose is unclear without more context.

**Library: jQuery Mobile**

jQuery Mobile is a touch-enabled HTML5 web application framework for mobile devices. Its primary features include:

* Touch-friendly UI components
* Mobile-optimized layouts
* JavaScript events handling

In this benchmark, jQuery Mobile versions 1.4.5, 1.3.2, and 1.1.2 are being tested.

**Special JS Feature/ Syntax: None**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in the provided code snippets.

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

The different approaches being compared here are:

* Loading external scripts using `loadScript`
* Using a library like jQuery Mobile

Advantages of using `loadScript`:

* Flexibility to load custom scripts
* Can be useful for testing specific scripts or libraries

Disadvantages of using `loadScript`:

* May introduce security risks if not used carefully (e.g., loading malicious scripts)
* Can lead to slower page loads if too many scripts are loaded

Advantages of using a library like jQuery Mobile:

* Provides pre-built, tested components and functionality
* Can save time and effort in development

Disadvantages of using a library like jQuery Mobile:

* May introduce additional dependencies and complexity
* Can limit flexibility and customization options

**Other Alternatives**

Other alternatives to loading external scripts or using libraries like jQuery Mobile might include:

* Using a Content Delivery Network (CDN) to load scripts and assets
* Implementing a modular architecture for script loading and execution
* Utilizing a testing framework specifically designed for JavaScript performance benchmarking

Note that the specific alternative solutions will depend on the specific requirements and constraints of the project.

Related benchmarks:

speedtestjqm (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 145 vs 132 vs 112

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

145

132

112

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 5 months ago):