var arr = [{id: 0, name: 'zero', completed: true}, {id: 1, name: 'one', completed: true}, {id: 2, name: 'two', completed: true}];
var temp = {id: 3, name: 'three', completed: false};
arr.push(temp);
arr = [arr, temp];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
push | |
spread |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
push | 5239980.0 Ops/sec |
spread | 1.3 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark definition and test cases for you.
Benchmark Definition:
The provided JSON represents a benchmark that tests two different approaches to add a single element to an array:
arr.push(temp);
arr = [...arr, temp];
These approaches are compared in terms of their performance.
Options Compared:
Two options are being compared:
push()
method to add a new element to the end of an array, while the second option uses the spread operator (...
) to create a new array with the original elements followed by the new element.Pros and Cons:
Push Method (arr.push(temp));
Pros:
push()
methodCons:
Spread Operator (arr = [...arr, temp]);
Pros:
Cons:
Library:
There is no library mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that both approaches use native JavaScript methods, which are not typically considered "libraries" in the classical sense.
Special JS Feature or Syntax:
None of these test cases rely on any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's available in modern browsers. They are straightforward examples of common array operations.
Other Alternatives:
If you wanted to benchmark different approaches to adding an element to an array, some alternative options could include:
arr.concat(temp)
instead of the spread operatorArray.prototype.splice()
to add a new element at a specific index_.insert()
methodKeep in mind that these alternatives may introduce additional complexity or dependencies, so it's essential to consider the trade-offs before adding them to your benchmark.