var x = 2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2;
const y = x >> 1;
const y = x / 2;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Right shift | |
Divide |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Right shift | 93295472.0 Ops/sec |
Divide | 100263592.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases to understand what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark measures the performance of two arithmetic operations: right shift (>>>) and division (/). The benchmark is designed to compare these two operations, which are often used in various algorithms and mathematical formulas.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code is a simple expression x = 2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2;
, which calculates the value of x
by multiplying 2 together 12 times. This is likely done to provide a base value for the benchmark, ensuring that both operations are performed on a similar scale.
Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
x
) one position to the right and fills 0 on voids left as a result.x
) by the divisor.Pros and Cons
Other Considerations
x
to ensure that both operations are performed on a similar scale. However, this may not reflect real-world scenarios where smaller values or different inputs might be used.Library and Special JavaScript Features
There is no explicit mention of a library being used in the benchmark code. However, it's likely that MeasureThat.net provides some underlying libraries or frameworks to facilitate microbenchmarking.
As for special JavaScript features, none are explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark code.
Alternatives
Other alternatives for testing arithmetic operations in JavaScript include:
>>
and /
, you can use built-in functions like Math.rightShift()
and Math.divide()
.setTimeout
function or a third-party library like Benchmark.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics, dependencies, or requirements compared to MeasureThat.net's approach.