var test = [1,2,3,4];
var c;
if (test instanceof Array) { c++; }
if (Array.isArray(test)) { c++; }
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Instanceof | |
isArray |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Instanceof | 130165728.0 Ops/sec |
isArray | 133006720.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches to check if an object is an array: using the Array.isArray()
method and using the instanceof
operator. The test case creates an array test
with four elements and assigns it to variable c
.
Options compared
There are two options being compared:
Array.isArray(test)
: This approach uses a static method on the global Array
object to check if the input test
is an array.test instanceof Array
: This approach uses the instanceof
operator, which checks if the input test
is a prototype of the Array
constructor.Pros and Cons
Array.isArray(test)
length
and other methods).test instanceof Array
instanceof
operator.Other considerations
In modern JavaScript, using Array.isArray()
is generally preferred over instanceof
because it's faster and more straightforward. However, if you're working with custom object types or need to account for edge cases, instanceof
might be a better choice.
Library usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test case. The Array.isArray()
method is a global method on the Array
constructor, and the instanceof
operator is a built-in JavaScript operator.
Special JS feature/syntax
There are no special features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison of two common array-checking methods.
Other alternatives
If you need to check if an object is an array in other scenarios, consider the following alternatives:
Object.prototype.toString.call(test)
(similar to instanceof
, but with additional type checking)Array
constructor's constructor
property (test.constructor === Array
)Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to the original benchmark.