<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var test = "abc a testing";
_.trim(test);
test.trim();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
trim lodash | |
native trim |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
trim lodash | 3977949.5 Ops/sec |
native trim | 99969688.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two JavaScript microbenchmarks that compare the performance of trimming strings using two different approaches:
trim()
function: A popular utility library for functional programming in JavaScript, which provides a convenient way to trim whitespace from strings.trim()
method of JavaScript strings, which removes leading and trailing whitespace characters.Options being compared
The two test cases are:
_.trim(test)
: This test case uses Lodash's trim()
function to trim the input string test
. Lodash is a third-party library that provides various utility functions for functional programming.test.trim()
: This test case uses the native trim()
method of JavaScript strings to perform the same operation.Pros and cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
trim()
function:trim()
method:Library usage
In this benchmark, Lodash is used for its trim()
function. The library is imported via the provided HTML script tag <script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
.
Special JS feature or syntax
This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, promises, or modern ES6+ features like arrow functions, template literals, or destructuring.