var n = 1000;
var arr = new Array(n);
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) {
arr[i] = i;
}
var n = 1000;
var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) {
arr.push(i);
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array constructor - 1000 items | |
Array literal - 1000 items |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array constructor - 1000 items | 181128.7 Ops/sec |
Array literal - 1000 items | 125440.3 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to create an array in JavaScript:
new Array(n)
syntax, where n
is the length of the array.[]
, followed by elements separated by commas.Options comparison
The test case compares these two approaches with different lengths of arrays (1000 items). The goal is to determine which approach is faster for creating large arrays.
Pros and Cons:
Special JavaScript feature
The test case uses a common JavaScript feature: for loops with incrementing indices. This is a fundamental concept in programming and is used extensively in arrays, objects, and other data structures.
Library usage
None of the provided benchmark cases use any external libraries. The tests are self-contained and rely on built-in JavaScript features.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to compare these approaches with additional methods for creating arrays, some possible alternatives could include:
Array.from()
or Array.of()
(introduced in ES6) to create an array from an iterable.However, since this benchmark focuses specifically on the new Array(n)
vs. square bracket notation syntax, it's likely that these alternative methods would be excluded from the test case.
Keep in mind that the performance difference between these approaches can vary depending on the specific JavaScript engine, browser, or environment being used.