var N = 1000000;
var vectors = [];
var vector;
for (var i = 0, li=N; i < li; ++i) {
vectors.push( {x:Math.random(), y:Math.random(), z:Math.random()} );
}
var vector;
for (var i = 0, li=vectors.length; i < li; ++i) {
vector = vectors[i];
vector.x = 2 * vector.x;
vector.y = 2 * vector.y;
vector.z = 2 * vector.z;
}
for (var i = 0, li=vectors.length; i < li; ++i) {
vector = vectors[i];
vector.x = 2 * vector.x;
vector.y = 2 * vector.y;
vector.z = 2 * vector.z;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
with duplicate declaration | |
without duplicate declaration |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
with duplicate declaration | 17.8 Ops/sec |
without duplicate declaration | 2.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of JavaScript engines in executing a simple loop that iterates over an array of vectors, multiplying each vector by 2.
Test Cases
There are two test cases:
**: This test case uses a
vardeclaration inside the loop, which means the variable
vector` is redeclared on each iteration.**: This test case does not use a
vardeclaration inside the loop, so the variable
vector` is only declared once.Comparison
The two test cases are compared to see how they affect the performance of the JavaScript engine. The idea behind this comparison is to understand how the scope and redeclaration of variables impact the execution time of the benchmark.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Other Considerations
The benchmark also considers the use of a library, which is not explicitly mentioned. However, we can infer that some libraries might be using techniques like caching or memoization to optimize performance in loops. In this case, the vectors
array is created on the fly, and its elements are accessed without any caching.
Special JavaScript Feature
There is no special JavaScript feature being tested here. The benchmark focuses on the basic execution of a simple loop with variable declarations.
Alternatives
If you were to rewrite this benchmark, you might consider alternatives like:
let
or const
instead of var
, which would avoid redeclaration issues.let
or const
without the loop or with more complex logic inside the loop.In summary, this benchmark is designed to highlight the impact of variable declarations on JavaScript engine performance. By comparing two test cases with different approaches to redeclaration, it helps identify which approach is more efficient and effective for executing loops in JavaScript code.