var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].push(7);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 3176339.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 10474023.0 Ops/sec |
Push | 16382542.0 Ops/sec |
Overview of the Benchmark
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript benchmark that compares three approaches for adding a single element to an array: the traditional concat()
method, the new ES6 spread operator (...
), and the push()
method.
Test Cases
There are three test cases:
concat()
method to add a single element to an array....
) to add a single element to an array.push()
method to add a single element to an array.Options Compared
The benchmark compares three options:
concat()
method....
) for adding elements to an array.push()
method for adding a single element to an array.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
concat()
for large arrays, and modern syntax.Library Usage
None of the test cases use any external libraries.
Special JavaScript Features/Syntax
The benchmark uses the new ES6 spread operator (...
), which is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It's used to add elements to an array or object by expanding its arguments into individual values.
Other Alternatives
Other alternatives for adding elements to an array include:
arr[0] = value;
: A simple assignment approach, but it's not as efficient as using the push()
method.new Array(arr.length + 1).fill(value);
: A way of creating a new array with the desired length and filling it with the specified value.