var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 1631538.2 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 8992744.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and analyze the provided benchmark.
What is tested?
The benchmark compares two approaches for concatenating arrays: Array.prototype.concat
(the traditional method) and the ES6 spread operator (...
).
Options compared
Array.prototype.concat
params
) and another array ([1, 2]
). It's a widely supported method in JavaScript....
)params
array into the existing array ([1, 2]
). It's a concise and modern way to concatenate arrays.Pros and Cons
push()
or slice()
concat()
Library usage
The benchmark doesn't use any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that some JavaScript engines may have their own internal optimizations or implementations of the spread operator.
Special JS features or syntax
...
) is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It's designed to make array manipulation more concise and expressive.concat()
is a native JavaScript method that has been part of the language since its inception. However, it may not be as efficient or readable as the spread operator.Other alternatives
If you want to explore alternative approaches, here are a few options:
Array.prototype.push()
: You can use push()
to add elements to an array and then return the resulting array.slice()
: You can use slice()
to create a new array with a subset of elements from another array.In summary, the benchmark compares two widely used methods for concatenating arrays: Array.prototype.concat
and the ES6 spread operator. The spread operator is a concise and modern way to concatenate arrays, but it may not be supported in older browsers.