<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
function is98(v){
return v === 98;
}
var data = [Array(100)].map((v, idx) => idx);
R.find(is98, data);
data.find(is98);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Ramda | |
Array (native) |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Ramda | 1895587.8 Ops/sec |
Array (native) | 7229712.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
The provided JSON represents a benchmark test for comparing the performance of Ramda's find
function with the native find
method of arrays in JavaScript.
What is being tested?
Two options are compared:
find
function: This function searches for the first element in an array that satisfies a given predicate (a function that returns a boolean value). In this case, the predicate is is98
, which checks if a value is equal to 98.find
method: This method also searches for the first element in an array that satisfies a given predicate.Pros and Cons of each approach:
find
function:find
method:Library: Ramda
Ramda is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a functional programming style for array and object manipulation. In this case, it's used to implement the find
function, which allows developers to write concise and expressive code.
Special JS feature/syntax: None mentioned
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
If you're interested in exploring other options, here are a few:
find
function to Ramda.forEach
and some
methods: Instead of using find
, you could use the native forEach
method to iterate over the array and check each element against the predicate, or use the some
method to stop iterating as soon as the first matching element is found.Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison between Ramda's find
function and the native find
method of arrays in JavaScript, highlighting the trade-offs between explicit code, performance, and library usage.