<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
function getRandomInt(max) {
return Math.floor(Math.random() * Math.floor(max));
}
var arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 100000; i++){
arr.push({value:getRandomInt(100)});
}
_.filter(arr, a => a > 50);
arr.filter(a => a >50);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash | |
arr |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash | 274.1 Ops/sec |
arr | 256.2 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark test for you.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that tests two approaches to filtering an array: using Lodash's filter
function and the built-in array.filter
method.
Options compared
The two options being compared are:
filter
function: This approach uses the Lodash library, which provides a utility function for filtering arrays. The filter
function takes an array and a predicate function as arguments, returning a new array containing only the elements that satisfy the predicate.array.filter
method: This approach uses the built-in filter
method of JavaScript arrays, which is similar to Lodash's filter
function but without the library.Pros and cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
filter
functionarray.filter
methodLibrary: Lodash
Lodash is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides a wide range of functions and helpers for tasks like filtering, mapping, and reducing arrays. It's designed to simplify common programming tasks and improve code readability.
Special JS feature/syntax
This benchmark does not use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond the standard let
, var
, and arrow functions used in the test case.
Alternative approaches
Other alternatives for implementing filtering logic include:
array.filter
method.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs and performance characteristics compared to Lodash's filter
function or the built-in array.filter
method.
Benchmark result interpretation
The provided benchmark results show the execution speed of both approaches on a specific test case (the filtering of an array with 100,000 elements). The results indicate that the built-in array.filter
method is slightly faster than Lodash's filter
function in this particular scenario.