Benchmark: lodash fp vs lodash vs vanilla vs ramda

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)'></script>
<script src="//cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/ramda@0.25.0/dist/ramda.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var array =  [...Array(6000)].fill('l')
var reducer = (r, x) => r + x

// Use `noConflict` to restore the pre-fp variant.
var fp = _.noConflict();

Tests:

Lodash
_.reduce(array, reducer, 0);
Lodash FP
fp.reduce(reducer, 0)(array)
Vanilla
array.reduce(reducer, 0)
Ramda
R.reduce(reducer, 0, array)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash
Lodash FP
Vanilla
Ramda

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:92.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/92.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 92 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash	6253.1 Ops/sec
Lodash FP	6119.1 Ops/sec
Vanilla	6071.8 Ops/sec
Ramda	5668.4 Ops/sec

lodash fp vs lodash vs vanilla vs ramda (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash vs Lodash FP vs Vanilla vs Ramda

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Lodash

Lodash FP

Vanilla

Ramda

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A