<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="el"></div>
document.getElementById("el").classList.remove("test");
$("#el").addClass("test");
document.getElementById("el").classList.add("test");
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
JQuery addClass | |
Vanilla JS Add Class |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
JQuery addClass | 1482003.4 Ops/sec |
Vanilla JS Add Class | 2949244.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON defines a benchmark with two test cases: "JQuery addClass" and "Vanilla JS Add Class". The benchmark is comparing the performance of adding an element to a class using jQuery (a JavaScript library) versus vanilla JavaScript (the default JavaScript without any additional libraries).
Script Preparation Code
The Script Preparation Code
section specifies that before running each test, the HTML element with the ID "el" should be cleared by removing the class "test". This ensures a clean slate for each test run.
Html Preparation Code
The Html Preparation Code
section includes a script tag referencing jQuery version 3.3.1 and an HTML div element with the ID "el", which will serve as the target element for adding the class.
Test Cases
The benchmark consists of two individual test cases:
Options Compared
The benchmark is comparing two approaches:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library Used
In this benchmark, jQuery is used. jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a convenient way to manipulate the DOM, handle events, and perform other common tasks in web development.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided code snippets.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives to jQuery or vanilla JavaScript for adding classes to elements, here are a few options:
Keep in mind that these alternatives may require different setup and configuration than jQuery or vanilla JavaScript, and may not offer the same level of convenience or performance.