Benchmark: Some vs. Filter vs. findIndex again

Script Preparation code:

var hasZero = [];
var withoutZero = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
  hasZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000));
  withoutZero.push(Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000) + 1)
}

Tests:

some test
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.some(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.some(v => v === 0);
filter test
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.filter(v => v === 0) : withoutZero.filter(v => v === 0);
findIndex test
var tempResult = !!Math.round(Math.random()) ? hasZero.findIndex((i) => i == 0) > -1 : withoutZero.findIndex((i) => i == 0) > -1;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
some test
filter test
findIndex test

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:87.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/87.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 87 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
some test	18849.8 Ops/sec
filter test	11775.1 Ops/sec
findIndex test	18886.7 Ops/sec

Some vs. Filter vs. findIndex again (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: some test vs filter test vs findIndex test

Created: 5 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

some test

filter test

findIndex test

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A